MoreCooler.com: It's more cooler with the thing

http://objective.jesussave.us/kidz.html

(From the same lovely people that brought us the eerie, whispering Baby Jesus head)

"Hopsiah the Kanga-Jew"... priceless. ^_^

Here is part of their argument as to how there could be so many people in such a short time. See anything funny?

Cain having a wife is. . .

NOT A PROBLEM STATISTICALLY:

Many people wonder how the Bible could talk about so many people so soon. But look at how quickly humans could potentially populate the earth.

This chart assumes a life span of 900 years, the first child of each reproducing couple is born at age 50, each couple has 500 child bearing years, and one child is born to each couple during every five years.

With assumptions like that, how could your conclusion be wrong?

The sad thing is, I think the argument you quote there is on a linked external site - ie, that's not meant to be satire.

Wasn't that kind of my point? (I added the emphasis) They seem to be taking this very seriously. If only they remembered what ass-you-me-ing does.

Now that I look at it more "logicaly," their math is wrong. 900 years - 50 years is 850 child bearing years. If each couple has a child every 5 years, that would be 170 child bearing years. Where does the 500 come from? They had to make that part up too?

did Kangaroos once live in the Middle East?

Like most people who have been indoctrinated by the secular media, your answer to this question will probably be:

"No, of course not! Kangaroos live only in Australia."

But is that really true? Let us think about this a little more deeply using a proper Biblical perspective. Ask yourself these questions:

* Do you believe that the Bible is the inerrant Word of the Lord? ("Yes.")
* Do you believe that the Lord brought the flood waters to the Earth and that all animals wherein the breath of life resided save those which Noah brought aboard his Ark were destroyed? ("Of course, that follows from your first question since the Bible tells us that this is what happened.")
* Do you believe that kangaroos were amongst those animals aboard the Ark? ("Yes. Even though they were not explicitly mentioned in the Bible, they have the breath of life and so clearly two of them must have been aboard the Ark. How else would they be alive today?")
* Do you believe that, after the flood waters asswaged, the Ark came to rest in the Middle East? ("Yes. The Bible says it came to rest on Mount Ararat, and while the exact location of Ararat might still be the subject of debate, it is clear from the later descriptions of Noah's generations that it must be somewhere in the Middle East.")
* Do you believe that the animals aboard the Ark exited it from where it rested, and that they must have spent some period of time in the Middle East? ("Yes. The Bible states that the animals went forth out of the Ark, and they must have spent time there either when taking up residence or in traversing the region to get somewhere else.")
* So then, did kangaroos once live in the Middle East? ("It is clear that they must have. There is no other sound, Biblical explanation!")

The Postdiluvian Earth:



Prior to and just after the Flood, the Earth's continents were joined in a super-continent today called Pangaea (Greek for "all Earth"). Evidence for this comes from the jig-saw shape of the continental plates as well as Biblical evidence. The Bible tells us that when God created the Earth it was without form (Gen 1:2), meaning that the land wasn't yet broken into distinct continents and was one amorphous mass. Also, God tells us that He gathered the waters under Heaven unto one place (Gen 1:9), meaning the single Ocean surrounding the super-continent. Animals leaving the Ark immediately after the Flood would have had easy access to migrate to all the lands of the Earth. (There is also an alternative theory that some kangaroos and other baramins destined for Australia "rafted" across the Tethys Sea on floating mats of vegetation ripped up by the Flood. However, this is still controversial.) Pangaea gradually started to break apart after the Flood, most likely due to the effects of rapid soaking and drying of the land.

As you can see, the logic is inescapable -- Kangaroos must have once lived in the Middle East. Any claim that they didn't must then be treated as refuted. But still there are questions that are left to be investigated. For instance: why are there no kangaroos left in the Middle East? how come we do not hear of kangaroos in the histories of the region? and how did the kangaroos get to Australia?

I like it how the kangaroos not only start in the Middle East, but hit every other major continent on their way to Australia.

Silly Christians, Al Gore isn't a nation. We all know he invented the Internet.